Waiting to evaluate one section of a paper (e.g., the Methods) until you have decided whether another section (e.g., the front end) passes muster is analogous to “multiple hurdle” systems in personnel selection. This usually creates a suboptimal weighting scheme in which the part of the system that represents the first hurdle is overvalued. I explain why “multiple hurdle” reviewing is counterproductive and offer a superior alternative.

中文翻译：

---

“多重障碍”审查的问题


等到你决定另一个部分（例如，前端）是否通过审查后才评估论文的一个部分（例如，方法），这类似于人员选择中的“多障碍”系统。这通常会产生一个次优的加权方案，其中代表第一个障碍的系统部分被高估了。我解释了为什么 “多重障碍” 审查会适得其反，并提供了一个更好的选择。