当前位置:
X-MOL 学术
›
Critical Studies in Television
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your
feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Women’s broadcasting histories and the archive: National, transnational and transmedial entanglements
Critical Studies in Television ( IF 0.9 ) Pub Date : 2025-05-02 , DOI: 10.1177/17496020251330853
Sarah Arnold 1 , Janet McCabe 2 , Kylie Andrews 3 , Alec Badenoch 4 , Jeannine Baker 5 , Vicky Ball 6 , Elisa Hendriks 7 , Vanessa Jackson 8 , Kate Murphy 9 , Ipsita Sahu 10 , Kristin Skoog 9 , Kate Terkanian 9 , Helen Warner 11
Critical Studies in Television ( IF 0.9 ) Pub Date : 2025-05-02 , DOI: 10.1177/17496020251330853
Sarah Arnold 1 , Janet McCabe 2 , Kylie Andrews 3 , Alec Badenoch 4 , Jeannine Baker 5 , Vicky Ball 6 , Elisa Hendriks 7 , Vanessa Jackson 8 , Kate Murphy 9 , Ipsita Sahu 10 , Kristin Skoog 9 , Kate Terkanian 9 , Helen Warner 11
Affiliation
This provocation details varied perspectives of the International Women’s Broadcasting Histories (IWBH) network on researching the role of women in broadcasting. The conversational form allows us to roam across the topic widely, to express a range of discrete positions and distinct arguments, with the desire to bring dilemmas to the surface and explore their implications without reduction. Responding with a series of interventionist statements around the issues and challenges of doing archival research into women’s work, we opt for retaining different viewpoints in a raw state, with the aim of provoking discussion about the methodological opportunities and limitations when working within and outside of archives.
中文翻译:
女性广播历史和档案:国家、跨国和跨媒体纠葛
这种挑衅详细介绍了国际女性广播历史 (IWBH) 网络在研究女性在广播中的作用的不同观点。对话形式使我们能够广泛地漫游这个话题,表达一系列离散的立场和不同的论点,希望将困境浮出水面,并在不减少的情况下探索它们的含义。围绕对女性工作进行档案研究的问题和挑战,我们以一系列干预主义的声明作为回应,我们选择将不同的观点保留在原始状态下,目的是引发关于档案内外工作时方法论机会和局限性的讨论。
更新日期:2025-05-02
中文翻译:

女性广播历史和档案:国家、跨国和跨媒体纠葛
这种挑衅详细介绍了国际女性广播历史 (IWBH) 网络在研究女性在广播中的作用的不同观点。对话形式使我们能够广泛地漫游这个话题,表达一系列离散的立场和不同的论点,希望将困境浮出水面,并在不减少的情况下探索它们的含义。围绕对女性工作进行档案研究的问题和挑战,我们以一系列干预主义的声明作为回应,我们选择将不同的观点保留在原始状态下,目的是引发关于档案内外工作时方法论机会和局限性的讨论。