s This research note introduces a new dataset—the Governmental Incompatibilities Data Project (GIDP) 2.0—which identifies the presence of incompatibilities over governments for all countries in the world from 1960 to 2020. Incompatibilities over government involve organizations making maximalist claims related to the legitimacy of elections, the composition of the national government, or regime change. GIDP 2.0 includes information about which of these claims is present in each incompatibility year. These data can facilitate analyses of the onset, dynamics, and outcomes of both civil war and nonviolent campaigns, improve our ability to predict their occurrence, and allow for analysis of whether international efforts to prevent violent conflicts over government are effective. We present a series of descriptive analyses showing that governmental incompatibilities are common but not ubiquitous, and occur across time periods, and within and across regime types. These descriptive analyses further show interesting variation among the types of claims articulated in democracies, autocracies, and anocracies and across different types of autocratic institutions. A brief two-stage analysis shows that some factors commonly included in studies of armed conflict and nonviolent campaign onset have different effects on the emergence of governmental incompatibilities and on whether these incompatibilities escalate to mass mobilization.

中文翻译：

---

介绍政府不兼容性数据项目 （GIDP） 2.0


s 本研究报告介绍了一个新的数据集——政府不相容性数据项目 （GIDP） 2.0，它确定了 1960 年至 2020 年期间世界上所有国家/地区在政府方面存在的不相容性。对政府的不相容性涉及组织对选举的合法性、国家政府的组成或政权更迭提出极端主义的主张。GIDP 2.0 包含有关每个不兼容年份中存在哪些声明的信息。这些数据可以促进对内战和非暴力运动的开始、动态和结果的分析，提高我们预测其发生的能力，并允许分析国际社会防止政府暴力冲突的努力是否有效。我们提出了一系列描述性分析，表明政府不相容性很常见，但并非普遍存在，并且发生在各个时期、不同政权类型内部和不同类型之间。这些描述性分析进一步显示了民主国家、专制国家和无政府国家以及不同类型的专制机构之间阐明的主张类型之间有趣的差异。一个简短的两阶段分析表明，武装冲突和非暴力运动开始研究中通常包括的一些因素对政府不相容性的出现以及这些不相容性是否升级为大规模动员有不同的影响。