Human rights rationales have in recent years been increasingly mobilized in international efforts to bring national legal frameworks on migrant smuggling in line with international law. This article explores the role of human rights in borderwork during the externally funded legal reform process of Senegal's legal framework on migrant smuggling. Adopting a multiscalar governmentality lens, it sheds light on human rights governance rationales and their underlying justice logics in the reform process. The article extends work on the human rights/containment/protection nexus and points to the co-existence of fragmented yet emancipatory human rights rationales that center questions of economic self-determination. In exploring underlying justice logics reproduced through human rights governance rationales by drawing on Mahmood Mamdani's conceptualization of justice responses in conjunction with Tendayi Achiume's work on neocolonial interconnection, it advances often overlooked questions of socio-economic self-determination and structurally induced precarity in debates on human rights in borderwork.

中文翻译：

---

在国家强制强制的不流动背景下“保护”偷运移民的权利：塞内加尔的合法边界工作

近年来，人权理由越来越多地被国际努力所动员，以使关于偷运移民的国家法律框架与国际法保持一致。本文探讨了在塞内加尔偷运移民法律框架的外部资助法律改革过程中，人权在边境工作中的作用。它采用多尺度的政府视角，阐明了改革过程中人权治理的基本原理及其潜在的正义逻辑。这篇文章扩展了关于人权/遏制/保护关系的工作，并指出了以经济自决问题为中心的碎片化但解放性的人权理由的共存。在借鉴 Mahmood Mamdani 对司法应对的概念化以及 Tendayi Achiume 关于新殖民主义相互联系的工作，探索通过人权治理理论复制的潜在正义逻辑时，它推进了经常被忽视的社会经济自决问题，并在边境工作中的人权辩论中结构性地引发了不稳定。