This study focuses on evaluating various strategies to mitigate land degradation in the context of climate change, aligned with the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD) and the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework Commitments. The core aim is to assess these strategies through the Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) approach, specifically the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The strategies assessed include Sustainable Land Management (SLM) practices, land restoration and rehabilitation, climate adaptation measures, strengthening policy frameworks, Nature-Based Solutions (NbS), community-based approaches, and financial mechanisms. The results indicate that land restoration strategies, such as reforestation and soil fertility restoration, received the highest performance score of 9 due to their effectiveness in reversing land degradation and mitigating climate change. SLM practices, NbS, and climate adaptation measures scored 8 for their ability to restore ecosystems and enhance resilience. Community-based approaches, policy frameworks, and financial mechanisms scored lower, with scores of 7 and 6, reflecting challenges in scalability, resource availability, and their supporting roles. These findings provide valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of different strategies, offering a basis for informed decision-making in combating desertification and land degradation in the context of climate change.

中文翻译：

---

应对气候变化中土地退化的最佳策略：与《联合国防治荒漠化公约》和昆明-蒙特利尔承诺保持一致

本研究的重点是评估在气候变化背景下减轻土地退化的各种策略，这些策略符合联合国防治荒漠化公约 （UNCCD） 和昆明-蒙特利尔全球生物多样性框架承诺。核心目标是通过多标准决策 （MCDM） 方法，特别是层次分析过程 （AHP） 来评估这些策略。评估的战略包括可持续土地管理 （SLM） 实践、土地恢复和恢复、气候适应措施、加强政策框架、基于自然的解决方案 （NbS）、基于社区的方法和财务机制。结果表明，土地恢复策略，如重新造林和土壤肥力恢复，由于它们在逆转土地退化和缓解气候变化方面的有效性，获得了最高的 9 分。SLM 实践、NbS 和气候适应措施在恢复生态系统和增强复原力的能力方面得分为 8。基于社区的方法、政策框架和财务机制得分较低，分别为 7 分和 6 分，反映了可扩展性、资源可用性及其支持作用方面的挑战。这些发现为不同策略的相对有效性提供了有价值的见解，为在气候变化背景下防治荒漠化和土地退化提供了明智的决策基础。